Monday, December 12, 2011
Letter to next year's cohort
Monday, November 28, 2011
Blog Response 28/11/12
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Prompt #12 Response
Monday, November 14, 2011
Prompt #11 Response
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Prompt #10 Response
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Prompt #8 Response
Monday, October 17, 2011
Prompt #7 Response
Monday, October 10, 2011
Prompt #6 Response
I don’t usually use various types of online spaces, such as twitter and blogs, but I do often use Facebook since I consider that it has the largest users in the world and certainly has shared cultures and values that I regard as significant worth in this global society.
Facebook is obviously worldwide. I believe that among numerous shared cultures and values, its characteristic of multiculturalism is what people are attracted to. Using Facebook, people can share any information, ideas, stories and even photos and videos with their friends in anywhere in the world. Following this, people can comment on anything they want to add or like any post they really understand and enjoy conveying their thoughts. For example, in Korea, many entertainment companies that have very popular K-pop singers actually have their own Facebook page to share and update any information about their concerts or the news to the world. Once they post some information in the wall, numerous fans from all around world start to like and comment on the post, sharing their thought and expressing how excited they are. Although fans come from all different kind of countries, cultures, and societies, they are finally connected each other with one united common idea.
I often believe that the world is not divided into several pieces anymore. They have become one unity as they are in online spaces. Facebook triggers this motion by sharing multicultural values to all over the world.
Monday, September 26, 2011
Prompt #4 Response
As online technologies have developed further, I believe that people will be able to do anything with online technologies in near future. The various kinds of online technologies, such as Facebook and Skype, enable people to feel that they are connected each other. Because of this characteristic of the online technologies, people who don’t live with family or have friends in places far from where they live use Facebook or Skype as their cheapest way to contact each other.
Like most teenagers, I also spend quite a long time to do Facebook. I often post funny pictures; of course I tagged them, and write some stories on my wall. Surprisingly, I often see the comments coming up on my stories right after I post. Then, I feel like they are my neighbors who are right next to me, sharing many stories each other.
Besides posting stories, pictures or videos on Facebook, people do also chat on face to face. This is quite similar to the main purpose of Skype – communicate each other in online. This is a real conversation, except that people cannot touch each other. If anyone who has only a laptop with cam, everyone can talk to anyone whom he or she wants to talk to.
Then why do people who live with family and have friends in near places use Facebook? Some people do facebook simply they get bored. They want to listen the other’s story and also tell your story. Other people use facebook to meet new people to socialize. Many people actually add their new friends even if they never meet them before.
In addition to these reasons, most importantly, people use Facebook because people are always curious about the other people. Who is he? What does he do? Where does he live? What does he like to do? All those questions might seem to be weird, like a stalker. However, I believe that having curiosity about the other is one of the human natures.
It is certain that developing online technologies will soon make another renovation. I’m ready to be impressed!
Monday, September 19, 2011
Prompt #3 Response
Tentative Thesis Statement:
The comic strips ‘Garfield Minus Garfield’ created by removing the main character Garfield from the original Garfield is not in violation of copyright law, since an idea can be copied and borrowed to convey a significant message, provoke a reaction or evoke an emotional response.
Introduction:
As the digital technology and the network have continuously developed, the artists have created more variable remixed works. Following this, we can easily see that the remixed works become much popular than the original works. The comic strips ‘Garfield Minus Garfield’ can be one example. If the artists create their remixed works by basically using the original works, are they in violation of copyright law?
People do not make new works out of nothing. ‘Garfield Minus Garfield’ is a web project created by Dan Walsh, dedicated to removing Garfield from the Garfield comic strips in order to reveal the existential angst of a Garfield’s owner Mr. Jon Arbuckle….
Sources/Arguments:
** Locate some strips of ‘Garfield Minus Garfield’ and a URL of a video.
Strips from: http://art110.wikispaces.com/Sullivan-Rebecca-P3 Video URL: http://www.collegehumor.com/video/5945411/remix-garfield-minus-garfield
1. An article from the New York Times ‘Is the Main Character Missing? Maybe Not.’ (Doty, Cate 2008)
2. An example of ‘Mickey Mouse’ with the argument of O’Connor from the article ‘Devoss & Porter’
3. An example of ‘Girltalk / Mashup’ from the article ‘Maciack’
Conclusion:
In short, I suggest that the remixed work of ‘Garfield Minus Garfield’ is not violating copyright law, because it is important to credit the work of creators in order to motivate creations and to encourage benefits to society….
Monday, September 12, 2011
Prompt#2 Response
I, like most teenage students, am also involved in various online technology practices that are not literally legal. I have downloaded free music, movies, and TV shows very often, and I can’t stop doing that. Those kind of online technology practices are like caffeine in morning coffee. It seduces people. It causes people to realize how conveniently and cheaply obtain various valuable sources through Internet, making the other people who purchase legally stupid. These characteristics of online technology practices have enough power to captivate people. In addition, most people believe that there is almost no way to be caught, since there are so many people doing it same. Furthermore, there is no strict law scaring people from downloading files illegally. However, as I especially grow up, I start to think from artists’ point of view, feeling guilty of getting free files that they tried their best to create. The income from selling their works would be how they earn money, and how they live. The interesting part is that all people surely know the way they getting free files is not right. If all people admit their fault, shouldn’t they be punished?